Text A is ‘To make a Currey the India Way’, from the Art of
Cookery made Plain and Easy in 1747. The most common semantic change in this
Text is narrowing. Words such as ‘shovel’ and ‘fowels’ have been narrowed, fowl
used to refer to all kinds of birds and now more commonly only to guinea fowl.
By recommending the reader to use fowl, it shows the lack of trade between
countries during this time as the author is suggesting local produce. Despite
this, there are examples of the influence of emerging British Empire and colonisation
of India as the recipe includes Coriander Seeds and how the curry is made the
‘India Way’. It was also before standardisation as f is interchangeable with s
which is now obsolete, examples of this is ‘foftly’ and ‘obferve’. Another
example of obsolete language use is the old subjunctive ‘if the sauce be too
thick’. Clipping is also used as ‘Spoonful’ loses the suffix, in addition, it
shows a change in how the compound becomes a single word. There is also
borrowing such as ‘Currey’ which would be taken from India. Also, ‘India’ in
the title is a proper noun being as an adjective which further shows the lack
of standardisation. Text A is the most formal of the Texts using verbs such as
‘obferve’, however, Text B also uses formal language such as ‘palatable’ which
is considered to be quite archaic language.
Text B is titled ‘No. 3 Economical Pot Liquor soup’ from ‘A
Plain Cookery Book for the Working Class’ in 1852. Another similarity between
Texts A and B is the evidence of a class hierarchy. A says ‘and fend it to
Table’ which insinuates through a servant and B is aimed at the working class.
In Text B there are many semantic changes of broadening with words such as
‘fat’ and ‘scum’, however, there is also narrowing in words such as ‘liquor’
which would now refer to an alcoholic beverage. There is also the use of
archaic language such as ‘broth’ which is also used dialectally. Another
example of the archaic language is adjectives being used differently, ‘found to
be too salt’, is not something that would be said in Modern English. This is
the only Text to use direct address towards the audience and also the only one
with a specific audience. This recipe is aimed at women on a budget and this is
shown through the opening sentence being ‘A thrift housewife’. A change in
lexis between Texts A and B is a greater awareness of time. In A the language
is imprecise as it says ‘ftew it foftly till the meat is enough’ and B says ‘on
the fire for about twenty minutes’ showing an advancement in understanding time
and possibly technology.
Text C a ‘wan kaj thai-style curry’ from 1998 in ‘Meals in
Minutes’ has an entirely different approach as it is cooking food that is in
fashion rather than economical for large families on a budget. A similarity
between A and C is the use of imperatives but this is one of the only
similarities between the two. There has been a large technological advancement
between 1747 and 1998. A and B show a lack of technology through phases such as
‘on the fire’ and ‘over the fire’ which shows an apparent lack of oven.
Whereas, C uses terminology such as ‘non-stick pan’. Another example of
advancement is in the increasing precision of measurements. By 1998 there were exact
measurements of 400g of coconut milk whereas A has a ‘large Spoonful’. Text C
reflects the society’s desire of being more health conscious as it contains
nutrition values which shows more scientific neologisms being present. Another
way it reflects society is the smaller number that it serves and how it is
aimed at people in a hurry but the detailed instructions show it is also aimed
at people who are inexperienced cooks but are cooking for pleasure more than
necessity. Examples of the detailed instructions are the increase of adjectives
such as ‘gentle simmer’. The language
used is quite elliptical which shows a change as the previous Texts were quite
formal.
The sentence structure in A is very minimal. The entire text
is split into three sentences which shows the little discourse structure. There
is no obvious recipe structure and it is a list laid out on paragraphs. It has
a newspaper aesthetic which is a similar graphology to Text B, the
capitalisation in Text A adds emphasis to this effect. In addition, they both
have long sentences and being laid out in paragraphs. Text C has a completely
different graphology which is more easily read which could reflect how it is
designed for people in a hurry to cook. C is also the only Text to have a
persuasive paragraph previous to recipe showing a change in how people can
choose what to cook rather than what they can afford for a large family. The
technology advancement also shows as how it can be printed changes the layout.
In addition, the changes of fonts at different is a part of the discourse
structure and graphological device.
Well done Katie. You have demonstrated good engagement with the texts. A systematic, analytical approach is developing. Good use of terminology. Aim to link the language features more effectively to the context of the texts. You are beginning to do this but it could be discussed in more detail! You do this best with the modern text. Really promising!
ReplyDelete